A) Where does it say that in their ruling?? B) Wrong as I've proven several times.
Thus, they would have been legally insane to suddenly overturn the Supreme Court & reason and accept the idea that Vattel was the source of NBC.
They are legally insane because they made a claim that isn't supported by the case they cited.
It isn’t speculating to note that everyone knew Obama’s father wasn’t a US citizen.
Sure it is. You don't know this to be true. You're making an assumption. Second, what people really don't know and understand is that the Supreme Court said in MULTIPLE cases INCLUDING WKA, that the parents must be citizens for the child to be a natural born citizen. It's in writing and even the Hoosier hillbilly court admits the truth through their footnotes.
I cannot argue with a person who can’t read English. Sorry. I’ve posted links, I’ve cited large passages, I’ve pointed out that the entire legal world accepts my version...and you just squeeze your eyes shut and refuse to see.
Believe what you want. If you & your friends get to court, you will lose. 100% of the time. The courts have little use for crazy people, which is why your side has lost every time - usually without a hearing, since the courts think you are insane.
Anyone who believes a passage written in 1797 was the source for a phrase found in a document written in 1787 is just insane...or are you a Time Lord? Either way, you’ll get tossed out of court.