[RaceBannon]

By the way, did you notice how NONE of the arm chair lawyers and Constitutional scholars ever address what I personally saw when they invade these threads?

I wonder why that is?

[mnehring]

Howdy Race,
Not sure what part of this conversation I was pinged for, but as to why this usually doesn’t come up re Constitutional discussions is it isn’t hard evidence, it is simply your belief in who you met. I’m sure you would pass a poly, you believe it. The polygraph determines what you believe to be true, not hard evidence as to who that person was. If you believe 100% you met a young Obama, you will pass a polygraph but it wouldn’t be evidence that could change be admissible, especially after this amount of time.

It is just what you believe, yes another piece, but nothing that will change anything legally.

[El Sordo]

“I wonder why that is?”

Because anecdotal evidence is functionally worthless in this situation?