Didn’t verify his credentials? Do you think ANYONE involved in politics didn’t KNOW his father wasn’t a US citizen? Do you think there is a state DA that doesn’t currently know about the birther claims?
And is the Indiana court incompetent? If so, what evidence do you have to back up your internet blather?
You can blow as much smoke as you want on the Internet, but has any birther convinced ANY competent authority of their claims?
Answer: No. Not one, anywhere.
Squeal as much as you want, but you cannot produce a single person in a position of responsibility that will back up what you post - which is why you cannot get any court to look at your case. They try not to take cases from nuts...
Never said anyone did or didn't. I said there's NO EVIDENCE that anyone verified his credentials. Speculating about what people think they know is not the same as checking credentials.
And is the Indiana court incompetent?
Do faithers take Obama's birth myth as gospel?? Hell yes, they're incompetent. I've proved that several times to you. Do you have long-term memory problem??
If so, what evidence do you have to back up your internet blather?
Like downplaying Vattel's Law of Nations as "an eighteenth century treatise," ignoring that it's frequently cited for guidance by the SCOTUS. Then they call quotes from the authors of the 14th amendment, "various citations to nineteenth century congressional debate" as if it has no constructive purpose in divining the intent of the 14th amendment. Then mysteriously they cite Minor's definition of natural born citizen and somehow conclude, "Thus, the Court left open the issue of whether a person who is born within the United States of alien parents is considered a natural born citizen." In their footnote to this comment, they say, "Note that the Court in Minor contemplates only scenarios where both parents are either citizens or aliens, rather in the case of President Obama, whose mother was a U.S. citizen and father was a citizen of the United Kingdom." This acknowledges that Minor's definition of natural born citizen contemplates that BOTH parents must be citizens. The court exposes its incompetence by leaving off the last part of the Minor passage it quoted which says, "It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens." Well obviously they left this off because it undermines their claim that somehow the issue is left open. Moreover, they undermine their claim of guidance from WKA by footnoting that WKA wasn't declared to be a natural born citizen. At the end of their decision, they say again, "The Plaintiffs do not mention the above United States Supreme Court authority in their complaint or brief; they primarily rely instead on an eighteenth century treatise and quotations of Members of Congress made during the nineteenth century." Now how exactly is that different from quoting, "Mr. Dicey, in his careful and thoughtful Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws, published in 1896 ..." in supporting their nonsense claim that NBS is somehow equivalent to NBC?? And the biggest tip off of incompetence is the court's insistence on using pejorative political jargon, " As to President Obama‟s status, the most common argument has been waged by members of the so-called “birther” movement who suggest that the President was not born in the United States; they support their argument by pointing to “the President‟s alleged refusal to disclose publicly an „official birth certificate‟ that is satisfactory to [the birthers].”