Ahh...so if every state allows Obama on the ballot, it means nothing. They are, after all, just a bunch of idiots who don’t know anything. Unlike birthers, who know the REAL meaning of the Constitution.
And if no Legislature or DA objected, that means nothing, since they are all idiots.
And since no legislature or DA or SecState has, in light of the birther publicity, made a move to prevent someone with a non-citizen father from getting on future ballots, we can assume - traitors? Idiots?
And of course, if no member of Congress objected to the votes of Obama delegates in the Electoral College, it means they just all were not paying attention. Or are they all traitors too?
After all, you can find members of Congress who think Guam is in danger of capsizing, but not one who believes Obama is ineligible based on his father.
Sorry, but my point remains accurate - NO ONE with any electoral authority backs up your interpretation. They all believe Obama’s father does NOT disqualify him.
........Sorry, but my point remains accurate - NO ONE with any electoral authority backs up your interpretation. They all believe Obama’s father does NOT disqualify him.......
WOW now you are a mindreader along with being a shade tree lawyer! Tell me Mr Mindreader, what happened to Obama’s mamas passport records?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2577941/posts?page=11#11
Do you need a hanky?? I haven’t seen this much whining the last time Obama went on an anti-Fox news rant. I explained, and obviously you ignored, that Obama’s presence on the ballot was strictly on the basis of a self-declaration and there was no evidence anyone verified his credentials. You don’t refute that, but instead you simply resort to drama-queen rhetoric. Your point is hollow. No competent authority has declared Obama to be a natural born citizen in compliance with the Constitution. Whether anyone objected or not is circular logic. Getting away with fooling people doesn’t mean the huckster has been authenticated as legitimate.