Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
The first third of the decision is just there for decoration.

Man, you are losing it. Just there for 'decoration'??? This almost as stupid as saying a comment in an interview = a news release. The decision gave a definition of natural born citizen ... born in the country to parents who are citizens. WKA didn't fit the definition, so the court had to figure out a way to make WKA a citizen of the United States in accordance with the 14th amendment, because it wasn't clear that WKA fit the jurisdiction clause. That's why the English common law stuff is quoted. Nobody found NBC to be the SAME as NBS. You've miscontrued a statement saying subject and citizen are similar into meaning that NBS = NBS. Sorry, but this is nonsense and delusion. No wonder you're melting down.

291 posted on 08/26/2010 2:31:25 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

So have you figured out why no legal authority agrees with your interpretation of WKA? No one?

They dedicate a third of their decision to discussing how WKA meets the qualifications for NBS, and how NBS is just another phrasing of NBC...and you just wish it away?

Notice, the didn’t say that NBS & NBC are similar, but “precisely analogous”, with the difference only in form of government it falls under.

I’m not in meltdown. Every state in the union agrees with me. Every court. Every member of Congress. McCain. Palin. Limbaugh. Coulter. Malkin.

Can you explain why everyone has sold out, and only you are true?


296 posted on 08/26/2010 3:04:26 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson