Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
The ONLY definition without doubt is the only definition he could use...

Says who?

... and it was the definition that he clearly said was used by the framers.

He doesn't clearly say that at all. In fact, there is no documentation that I'm aware of on what definition the framers used when they crafted Article II.

Sorry, you don't like it, but he only picked one definition.

He didn't pick either definition, actually. Merely acknowledged both.

223 posted on 08/26/2010 9:19:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Says who?

Says Justice Waite.

He doesn't clearly say that at all. In fact, there is no documentation that I'm aware of on what definition the framers used when they crafted Article II.

Justice Waite told us in the decision, "At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, ...

He didn't pick either definition, actually. Merely acknowledged both.

There's no both. "It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens."

227 posted on 08/26/2010 9:24:23 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson