Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum
"The LCS is also seen as critical to the Navy's plans to increase its fleet size to 313 ships."

Just a couple of comments:)

1. That we are down to less than 300 ships is a SERIOUS National Security Issue. Nothing projects graduated power like an effective Navy...and it's the US Navy that has been the bulwerk of our national security for over 200 years.

2. These are not "Littoral Combat Ships". A littoral combat ship is a BB. This idea that small, pinpoint explosives (at ENORMOUS COST) is a substitute for tonnage (and I'm talking about ordinance here, not displacement) is one of the biggest blunders in modern naval thinking. When it comes to hitting a beach, you need guns. Big ones. Lots of them. Yeah, a modern vessel needs Aegis, Phalanx, VLS for cruise missles etc, but there is not now and probably never will be a substitute for big GUNS when it comes to putting men on a beach.

3. "Sweeping mines" and "Chasing Pirates" used to be handled by Mine Sweepers, Patrol Boats and Frigates...at FAR FAR less cost than $500mil a copy...and you could put a Frigate, 5 mine sweepers and 10 Patrol Boats at sea with that much money...with modern weapons.

I don't know what these guys are thinking in the Chrystal Palace, but numbers, speciality and proven models matter. I hope this isn't a few Congressmen pushing a White Elephant.

6 posted on 08/23/2010 5:35:03 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
This would be a good spot for someone (who knows how to) to post a picture of one of the Iowas lighting off a broadside.
9 posted on 08/23/2010 5:39:35 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson