You are intolerant of anyone who doesn't share your social liberalism. If you were really tolerant you'd have a “live and let live” attitude about social conservatives.
But no, you recite the leftist talking points about “tolerance” and “inclusiveness” but it boils down to “free speech for me (leftist social issues) but not for thee (conservative social viewpoint).
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Your talking points are typical leftist spew that is so internally inconsistent that if you were to actually practice what you preach you'd implode. You drone on and one about tolerance, yet you cannot tolerate. You drone on and on about inclusiveness, and reject every vestige of moral absolutes.
Real conservatives are upfront and not hypocrites like all leftists. We say some things are right, and some things are wrong. Some wrong things can be tolerated, and some cannot. Pointing error or mistake or evil is a duty. You claim that no one should “judge” or point out wrong, and yet that is all you do!
In the leftist world view, hypocrisy is the very foundation upon which you stand.
“In the leftist world view, hypocrisy is the very foundation upon which you stand.”
You missed the point all together. My point is that to vilify Ann for agreeing to speak to a group without knowing anything about what she is going to say is unwise.
If you had a child that was gay would you not speak to that child for fear of being accused of tolerating the lifestyle? Would you condemn a pastor for speaking to a gay because you feel that he would be condoneing the lifestyle?
I, for one, am not going to condemn Ann untill I know what she has said and if she in fact condones the lifestyle.