Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jellybean; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah

I think I am coming at this whole issue from a different angle. It may be tons, or just a few, but strong response to error is a good thing. However, what bothers me is being attacked as a promoter of a homosexual agenda when I have never once commented in support of anything that can even be creatively depicted as such. I agree that there is probably reason for people to be touchy, but if we are going to eat our own then good conservatives are quickly going to find other places to post. What good would FreeRepublic be doing then? That is my point of view anyway.


201 posted on 08/25/2010 11:33:17 AM PDT by cothrige
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: cothrige; jellybean; little jeremiah
but if we are going to eat our own then good conservatives are quickly going to find other places to post.

I don't think these were "our own". The lead poster uses either emotion or misuses Scripture to push the agenda. The 2 other posters cheer them on. The talking points are right out of the lefty handbook. I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it played out once a day for the last week or so. I hadn't been paying attention before that.

203 posted on 08/25/2010 11:40:12 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: cothrige

You’ve been much more polite than I would have been. It was an unprovoked attack that shouldn’t have been allowed to stand.


204 posted on 08/25/2010 11:41:20 AM PDT by jellybean (Bookmark http://altfreerepublic.freeforums.org/index.php for when FR is down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson