Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP in Default Mode
American Thinker ^ | August 23, 2010 | J.R. Dunn

Posted on 08/23/2010 3:46:19 AM PDT by Man50D

It's widely acknowledged that in 2010, the Democrats are on the ropes. But just about the same could be said for the Republicans.

A few weeks ago, John Cornyn and John Boehner revealed this election's GOP platform. In a year of massive unrest, public disgust with government, and large-scale rejection of interventionist policies, the GOP will emphasize...deficits. An issue to warm an economist's heart -- and the occasional accountant's, too. Top that one, Obama.

In the wake of Scott Brown's stunning upset in Massachusetts last February, with the entire New England region open to exploitation, the GOP is doing nothing. There are no plans to challenge incumbents in New England. No money, no candidates, no program. Historical moment? Wuzzat mean?

No effort is being made to emphasize the achievements of the nation's Republican governors. Jan Brewer, Chris Christie, and Mitch Daniels, among others, are steering their states through the worst economy since the Carter '70s, pressing critical policy changes, and most important, defying Washington while they're at it. Yet the RNC knows them not.

We will merely allude to Michael Steele's perennial circus act to look beyond to 2012, where we have one announced candidate, the immortal Mr. Newt Gingrich, whose most recent sojourn is a national tour with the most Rev. Al Sharpton.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: election2010; gop; rnc; stupidparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: MNJohnnie

And your history would be wrong. Both of the current parties, Democrats and Whigs, were third parties at some point.

When the Whigs found themselves on the wrong side of the slavery argument, they were destroyed. If the GOP is on the wrong side of the abortion argument, they’ll be destroyed too.

We need a party that just as they were opposed to slavery, is apoosed to abortion. If that party is not the GOP, they will fade and die away. There’s already a pro abortion party, it’s called the Democrats. We don’t need another.


81 posted on 08/23/2010 11:59:46 AM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

82 posted on 08/23/2010 12:05:16 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (It's a time for choosing. You can have liberalism or you can have America. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
AIP is the personhood pro-life party. 100% of our Affiliates. 100% of our party leaders. 100% of our endorsed candidates. And we make our political associations and endorsements based solely on proven adherence to America's core principles, not on something so petty as party registration or affiliation.
83 posted on 08/23/2010 12:08:32 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (It's a time for choosing. You can have liberalism or you can have America. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

>> If you cannot organize Conservative/Libertarians enough to take back control of the GOP,...

bttt


84 posted on 08/23/2010 12:10:31 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
FYI, if the Republicans don't have a working majority of conservatives OF COURSE they have to "reach out" and try to get some Dems or horse trade votes.

Are you in the 2nd grade?

Since politics is about N-U-M-B-E-R-S, its all they can do if the idiots who populate this country don't understand what the hell is going on or what they're doing or stay home or whine about RINOs or vote 3rd party...they deserve the government they get.

85 posted on 08/23/2010 12:15:15 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I don’t pretend third parties will have any relevancy.

I’m just saying that the talk that the GOP is the future of political conservatism is a wild and unfounded assumption on your part.


86 posted on 08/23/2010 12:29:37 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

I believe you are right. I increasingly think that the fiscal and economic concerns of a broad swath of the electorate are going to sweep aside the “social wedge issues” such as gun control, abortion, and so on and replace them with issues that are all economic:

1. The economy, state and federal debt levels, banking corruption, etc.
2. Immigration as a jobs issue. A surplus of labor depresses wages, period. No one need conduct some PhD-level study to realize this.
3. The costs of things like healthcare, education, public sector salaries/pensions, etc.

The Fed is showing that the Elite’s plans and schemes have limits. In the case of the Fed, once they get to zero percent interest rates, they’re essentially out of options. Once the similar conclusion registers on the Keynesians who want to spend, spend, spend, then the voters won’t buy their promises of ‘stimulus.’ The voters will be demanding someone come in with some fresh ideas, and not a huge laundry list of ideas, either. Look at Christy in NJ - he has a pretty narrow platform: cut, cut, cut. Real cuts, not “let’s just cut the rate of growth.”

At first, the voters were skeptical, now they’re getting converted to his side. If he has a successful four years, I think we’ll see some other politicians realize that the voters can handle the truth if they act like it is the truth, ie, the pols walk their talk.


87 posted on 08/23/2010 12:36:57 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

What dogma is being expressed here? I don’t see any. I’m looking for the dogma you keep flapping your gums about, and all I’m seeing is you, out standing in your field, erecting straw men.


88 posted on 08/23/2010 12:39:20 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

More like stopping 20 feet too late to hit my children vs. stopping 40 feet too late.


89 posted on 08/23/2010 2:42:36 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Agreed. All anyone I talk to reiterates the economic disaster looming regarding spending, deficits, taxes, Obamacare, Cap and Trade, etc. Very few social issues mentioned besides immigration.


90 posted on 08/23/2010 2:45:57 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Repubs would be hitting the brakes, Democrats the gas.


91 posted on 08/23/2010 2:47:25 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

Fun game.

The Repubs would know that no matter what they did there would be people to defend them.


92 posted on 08/23/2010 3:03:57 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Its not a game.

Republicans are our only hope of stopping Pelosi and Obama.

Wake up!

Leaving Dems in total control for two more years will be apocalyptic, its bad enough now.


93 posted on 08/23/2010 3:09:18 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

1 - My vote is set.

2 - Having no standards for who we vote for is enslaving to us and liberating to the Republicans. They can be anything or everything they want. There’s nothing we can do if our only measurement is that they aren’t Democrats.

Question: Would you vote for Lindsey Graham?


94 posted on 08/23/2010 3:16:25 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

I did vote for Lindsey. He had no opposition besides a Democrat. Same for McCain.

I hated it, but it was the correct thing to do.

Penicillin is hard to stomach and leaves a bad taste, but I would take it before I died of rheumatic fever. Voting for moderates is quite similar.


95 posted on 08/23/2010 3:19:59 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

“Going third party, however, is the cowardly fool’s way out.”

It is a career path move. TV, books, appearances.

Pat Buchanan, Harry Browne, Tom Tancredo, Alan Keyes, Bob Barr, Ralph Nader...and more.

And it works. Each abovementioned personality most likely earns a handsome living, from this career path strategy.

They have followings in the hundreds, sometimes even the thousands.

Tancredo and Barr held lower office, the rest never bothered to stand for any election they actually had a chance of winning.

Tancredo in Colorado is a clear example of the downside from these people. After disrupting the election, he’ll be the darling of the liberal media, looking for a willing talker to criticize the GOP.

A twofer.


96 posted on 08/23/2010 3:31:28 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun

I will never vote for Graham.

Let me put it this way:

If I were running you would vote for me.

If you were running I might not vote for you.

I win and maybe you don’t. You’ve lost the power of your opinion and I haven’t. That is what you are giving up by insisting on voting for the Notdemocrat.


97 posted on 08/23/2010 3:34:16 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MontaniSemperLiberi
That is what you are giving up by insisting on voting for the Notdemocrat.

Well, a lot of voters like you gave up our private healthcare by not voting for the Notdemocrat.

Thanks.

You also cost us about two trillion dollars.

Go ahead and sit on your *ss because the Repub isn't conservative enough. You will get the government you deserve, again.

98 posted on 08/23/2010 3:47:12 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
A "third party" is exactly what the the poster of this thread is advocating.

Do you make it a point to mislead and misinterpret or is it just a bad habit?

The last sentence of that first paragraph: Another party will restore the two party system. How do you get a third party from that sentence?
99 posted on 08/23/2010 4:15:15 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
What you see here is why third party movements always fail.

What you fail to see is we have only a one party system. One party systems tend make the country fail with their unchecked power. You have reduced your comments to drivel for repeatedly attempting to distort my clearly posted statements regarding a current one party system that can be restored to a two party system by uniting under a Conservative party banner.

That is what has happened to every single third party movement in US history. Every single one. This attempt will end no differently.

Oh really? I suggest you review the history of the OP(formerly the GOP). They formed as a third party, rose to power in 1853 and replaced the Whigs.
100 posted on 08/23/2010 4:24:30 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson