To: driftdiver
Ahh so you are judging her based on events that have not happened yet.
Now you are just being silly. You are implying that I can't know what she's really going to do, so I can't know whether she's going to condemn homosexuality at the convention or not. That's ridiculous. It's like saying I can't know whether the sun is going to rise tomorrow morning. Coulter has said what she's going to do, in general terms, and none of that included the slightest disapproval of the theme of the organization. I suppose we could wait until after the convention to discuss this, just so you can't object that it hasn't happened yet, but that would be pointless. We all know she isn't going to disapprove of the homosexual theme of the convention. Period.
90 posted on
08/22/2010 4:57:22 PM PDT by
fr_freak
To: fr_freak
“Now you are just being silly. You are implying that I can’t know what she’s really going to do, so I can’t know whether she’s going to condemn homosexuality at the convention or not.”
No I’m saying you’re repeating a failed and un-Biblical strategy. Maybe she will do what you say, maybe she won’t. She usually doesn’t shy from controversy so I’m guessing she won’t.
Perhaps if you showed love for the sinner they might listen to you. As it is they are gaining political power and will force their agenda on everyone.
93 posted on
08/22/2010 5:00:33 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson