i am not retarded so yes, it would be an abuse of people who truly are but it is not as bad as the other R word. It would reflect on you to some extent depending on context but you obviously don’t care, so be it.
as for the “heads up” remark, i know you are trying to be clever, but i hardly dictate what does and doesnt pass as acceptable language on FR much less anywhere it seems, so maybe it is a consolation to you I have likely heard more revolting language except those of you who have fought in a war.
Why not any F bombs on FR? is JimRob also PC? I mean we’re all adults here, arent we? I had another example in mind but wont go there. The Muslims have a right to beuild a mosque on property they own that is appropriately zoned at GZ. But it will be an abuse that could backfire on them. Go ahead and use the R word publicly as an epithet and proclaim it your right to do and see what you gain. On the whole, i think you are justifiably sensitive about Liberals and MSM language control and I believe you are right about large majority of it. That is not to say though a broken clock cant be right twice a day, OK? that’s my opinion that’s all g2g will check you later
That's debatable.
You know, 50% of people fall below the IQ of 100. That means that technically half the population is "retarded". So there is a 50/50 chance that you are retarded.
Of course the other 50% are "gifted".
Isn't that the politically correct term for smart asses?