Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett
Much more attractive (and more interesting) in the au naturel state than painted IMHO.
11 posted on 08/20/2010 12:36:23 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (Liberals are a Cackle of Rads!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SonOfDarkSkies

I agree.


13 posted on 08/20/2010 12:36:54 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
To modern eyes, natural stone looks impressive; while painted stone is hard to distinguish from a tacky fiberglass lawn ornament. Natural stone was everywhere in the ancient world; colour and ornamentation were a probably a welcome break from the norm.

In more recent times, fine wooden furniture was usually painted. Now, we want the natural wood exposed — in part to distinguish the pieces from cheap utilitarian objects made from plywood, Formica, or plastic. We also appreciate the wood grain, and the visible joinery. When the common man had natural wood furniture, with visible joinery — fine furniture was painted or enameled & joinery hidden, as a mark of quality.

24 posted on 08/20/2010 12:51:29 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson