Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

You might be right. The Chinese would be a lot more ruthless that our norm, anyways - Probably somewhere along the line of the Belgian Congo. So they’d be able to control more area with fewer people.
In any case, Chinese control of Africa could only improve Africa.


61 posted on 08/23/2010 5:55:53 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
You might be right. The Chinese would be a lot more ruthless that our norm, anyways - Probably somewhere along the line of the Belgian Congo. So they’d be able to control more area with fewer people.

No, they would be ruthless in a different way. As I keep saying, China needs Africa's resources, particularly mineral resources. China does not need the Africans.

China would view the Africans' continued existence in mineral-rich territory as a threat to China's long-term control of the territory. By whatever means necessary, the Chinese would desire the removal of the Africans from areas of strategic value (mining territories, ports, the land that links the two) and their replacement with Chinese settlers.

63 posted on 08/23/2010 8:05:05 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson