Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Even in religions or cultures that allowed polygamy, it still mean Man and Woman or Women. And even in those cultures/societies/religions it wasn’t the norm. It served the purpose as well of providing husbands for women when many men were killed in battle, became monks or whatever.

Polygamy more often means polygyny (multiple wives) but in some rarer instances it means polyandry (multiple husbands). In polyandrous marriages, the husbands are most likely brothers. They have one wife in common. If a man can't be a father, at least he can be an uncle. One of the goals in such a union is to limit offspring due to scarcity of resources (land, etc.).

418 posted on 08/19/2010 7:44:42 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]


To: thecodont

Most polygamous cultures or cultures that allowed it seem from my reading to have polygyny - more than one wife per husband. I didn’t know that word.

Even in ancient Hindu culture or Vedic culture it was mostly royalty who had multiple wives - they could afford it. I never read of multiple husbands in the OT, not that I am a scholar!


420 posted on 08/19/2010 7:48:44 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]

To: thecodont

that was found only in ONE perhaps two cultures and is village level rare. as in dying out.

Multiple wives still provides the norm because it was entirely based on children or preventing widows from starving. It provided legal protections for the children of those offspring. It was not the cutsey delusion of the harem.


421 posted on 08/19/2010 7:50:04 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson