To: RobinMasters
I don’t think that “II” or “Jr.” are part of anyone’s legal name. Traditionally, the oldest carrier of a name in a given family does not use “Jr.,” “II,” “III,” etc. William F. Buckley, Jr., notwithstanding. Since Hussein, Sr., has been dead for decades, quibbling over Hussein’s “II” just makes birthers look silly.
27 posted on
08/18/2010 10:10:52 PM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
To: Arthur McGowan
I dont think that II or Jr. are part of anyones legal name. Traditionally, the oldest carrier of a name in a given family does not use Jr., II, III, etc. William F. Buckley, Jr., notwithstanding. Since Hussein, Sr., has been dead for decades, quibbling over Husseins II just makes birthers look silly.
Interesting comment - it seems like Arizona is proposing to change it's Birth Certificate format to make the suffix a part of the legal name. At present, it is not.
http://www.azdhs.gov/plan/cert/pdf/birth.pdf
I wonder what other states do...
29 posted on
08/18/2010 11:06:23 PM PDT by
az_gila
(AZ - one Governor down... we don't want her back...)
To: Arthur McGowan
I know several people who are “Juniors” or “the third”, and they have II, or III on their driver’s licenses and social security cards.
That tells me their full, legal, registered name.
I even know one guy who has “Esq.” on his TDL. Weird, ain’t it?
33 posted on
08/19/2010 8:46:29 AM PDT by
Ro_Thunder
(Press want Obama = “Camelot II - The Return of JFK”, not “Peanuts II - that’s all you’ll have l)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson