Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreatGrey; LucyT; stuartcr; little jeremiah; Red Steel

Thanks for the screenshot. I stand corrected. Shows what a higher quality vid can show. However, there are still a few puzzling things about the video. The first is why the date of issuance is blurred out on the photo page. Plus, they never show the cover of passport from which they show the photo page. It shows him opening the folder, and they instantly cut to the close up of the passport photo. They then cut to a scene where he is opening a passport ( with the biometric symbol on it ), but never show the photopage from that passport. Why not just take one continuous shot of taking the passport out of the folder, opening it to the photopage and then flipping through to the stamp page. Why three separate edited shots ? What is significant about this is the shot of the photopage may be from an older passport ( hence the issue date being blurred )If we could see the cover of the passport, it would confirm it. The newer passports ( starting in 2006 )have a biometric symbol on the cover. If this photopage was taken from his old Senate passport, it would not have the biometric symbol ( that was issued prior to 2006 ).


471 posted on 08/19/2010 9:00:00 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher

What about the fact that his photo is the same as the official portrait? Don’t passports photos need to have certain specs? I know mine did. The lights they use make your eyes look strange. White background, I think, too - someone mentioned.

Or is the pres allowed different standards regarding photos.


476 posted on 08/19/2010 9:58:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson