[edge919]

Your capitalization in WKA says Citizen of the United States, not natural born citizen. If you know your constitution, which is doubtful since you don’t even know what a news release is, then you would understand that citizen of the United States only makes one eligible for Congress. Your citation of Ankeny is undermined by that court’s footnote in the decision where they undermine their own argument and acknowledge that, despite the claim of phantom guidance from WKA, no one in WKA is declared to be a natural born citizen and especially not by the parts they cited. Are you ready to go back and try to learn what a news release is, since you don’t understand the Supreme Court’s decision in WKA??

[jamese777]

Your capitalization in WKA says Citizen of the United States, not natural born citizen. If you know your constitution, which is doubtful since you don’t even know what a news release is, then you would understand that citizen of the United States only makes one eligible for Congress. Your citation of Ankeny is undermined by that court’s footnote in the decision where they undermine their own argument and acknowledge that, despite the claim of phantom guidance from WKA, no one in WKA is declared to be a natural born citizen and especially not by the parts they cited. Are you ready to go back and try to learn what a news release is, since you don’t understand the Supreme Court’s decision in WKA??

---

No distinction in the law or via the Supreme Court has ever been made between a 14th Amendment “born citizen” and an Article 2, Section 1 “natural born citizen.” They are one in the same.
If there was such a distinction Barack Hussein Obama could not be President of the United States, and he is the president. The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court is a constitutional scholar and an originalist/ strict constructionist. He would never have agreed to administer the Oath of Office to an ineligible person.