[Robbin]

I stopped reading Farah when he wrote that men that commit adultry should be executed. I rate that right up there with the ROPS... It’s a conservative site run by a NUT.

Don’t ask for a link, it’s bee a couple of years, but I bet if you spend time searching his site, you’ll find it.

[donna]

You’re just making up stories. Go to DU, that’s their job.

[Rashputin]

I stopped reading Farah when he wrote that men that commit adultry should be executed.

LOL. I know Farah is what he is but I think his article is an interesting take on Beck's reaction. Beck did exactly the same thing Clinton did when Clinton answered a question with, "it depends on what the meaning of is is". I'm thinking that Beck is being protective of his viewership numbers and avoiding the issue in order to drive off as few viewers as possible. That, in turn, sort of makes Farah's point whether Farah is a nutcase or not.

I didn't realize so many people just jumped to the defense of Beck without looking at various aspects of what his thinking is and what he puts a priority on. As for defending WND or Farah, their stature really makes no difference to me one way or another. A broken clock is still correct twice a day, as they say.

I wouldn't even suspect you're exaggerating something said at WND by Farah so your word is good enough link or no link.

Regards

[Matchett-PI]

"I stopped reading Farah when he wrote that men that commit adultry should be executed. I rate that right up there with the ROPS... It’s a conservative site run by a NUT. Don’t ask for a link, it’s bee a couple of years.."

You got THAT right. And its been more than a couple of years. Try January 30, 2003:

HERE