How can a Savior be other than sent from God?
Are you asking me if my understanding of Savior differs from yours?
Why? Do you think either of our opinions changes what a Savior sent by God really IS?
Don't Bible thump at me without being willing to define your terms, and respect other opinions than yours if you come across them.
Otherwise why even ask any questions? Just examine everyone for agreement with your personal opinions, and damn everyone that doesn't smile and nod when you demand them to.
But leave me out of your posturing - I find it ridiculous.
I’m sorry when to incorrect person.
How can a Savior be other than sent from God?
Then hypocritically you challenge those who hold, not only a fact based position, but one that has been confirmed by all traditional and orthodox denominations (including the LDS not all that long ago) with this statement:
Don't Bible thump at me without being willing to define your terms, and respect other opinions than yours if you come across them.
You want definitions? How about the Scriptures themselves? Lets take the most well known passage in all of the New Testament, John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave His only begotten Son...
The Scriptures say that Jesus Christ is the ONLY Son of God. The Mormons teach that Jesus Christ has a brother who is Satan. The doctrinal implications of this alone are astounding and should completely discredit any claims to Christianity by any professing Mormon. The Mormons also teach that Jesus Christ is a created being, that He is NOT self-existing, eternal, Alpha and Omega. Yet in John we read that Jesus Christ created ALL things unto Himself.
So The Mormons believe in a profoundly different Jesus. To say that any old Jesus will do is akin to saying that Jesus the gardener will save your soul, or that the Muslim Allah is just another name for Jehovah.
It is very interesting that you would bring up "definitions" for a key feature of LDS soteriology is that Man is expected to do as much as he can for his own works based salvation, and Jesus will cover the rest. This is a fundamental blasphemy which completely rejects the orthodox doctrine of Redemption. The Mormons then redefine "Redemption" to suit their heresy. Mormons also redefine "God" to not almighty Creator God of all the Universe, but "god" as in some level of existence that created man can attain. The "Jesus" the LDS claim to worship is simply one of these little 'g' "gods". That is a clear violation of the Ten Commandments for the LDS have created, in their doctrines, idols of worship and have hijacked the name "Jesus" so they can suck others into that demonic vortex.
There are plenty of websites devoted to comparing and contrasting the claims of the LDS with orthodox Christianity, often written by those who once were deeply emerged in their teachings yet by God's grace escaped that cult. Either you haven't bothered to examine them which means you speak in ignorance, or have decided that definitions don't matter, which is hypocritical, or you are deliberately trying to deceive which is something straight from Hell.
So which is it, and why should we care about your disdain for Truth?