You do see that I was responding to post #
59...right? So tell me, what does your question have to do with my response to post #59?
The question before Clarence Thomas here was not the birther case per se, but Taitz's misconduct in pursuing such.
The Supreme Court just doesn't go out looking for cases, cases have to be brought to it by those who have an understanding of how the process works. Countless cases get tossed aside for exactly that issue.