Records #2 and 3 are based on Record #1. Fukino had no problem citing record #1 in a singular reference in October 2008, just not in July 2009. There would be no reason to look at Records #2 or #3 to confirm Record #1, so this is another stupid and lame excuse that doesn’t hold water.
It should be obvious to anyone with a middle school ability to read for comprehension that in the October, 2008 statement, Dr. Fukino was attesting to whether the original, vault copy, long form birth record [singular] was on file. She was only addressing that one original document.
One more time: An original long form plus an original short form plus more than 90 pages of Index Data equals [plural] record(S). The long form and the short form are not the same document. They are plural, then add the Index data to the mix. A Court or a Grand Jury might very well subpoena BOTH the long form and the short form from the state of Hawaii to compare the information on both RECORDS.
edge 919 is trying to parse one letter in a generic term. There is not an Office of Vital Statistic, there is an office of Vital Statistics.
Any reporter interviewing Dr. Fukino or any deposition taken by an attorney would be able to clarify the difference between a record and records in about two minutes.
Can you NOT read?? That's what I've been saying. She referred to ONE document in October 2008, but she did NOT do this in July 2009. There should have been no need to cite any other records or multiple records or to change the terminology IF the original birth ceritificate proves Obama was born in Hawaii. Since she did NOT cite the original birth certificate for the July 2009 statement as the document verifying his place of birth, then the logical conclusion was that she could NOT because it does not verify where Obama was born.
And I've addressed the faulty faither response that I'm quibbling over the use of one letter. She changed TWO WORDS to avoid making a legal statement she can't support.
Any reporter interviewing Dr. Fukino or any deposition taken by an attorney would be able to clarify the difference between a record and records in about two minutes.
Duh. This is why she said in the July 2009 statement ... "I have nothing further to add to this statement ..." She was shielding herself off from any questions, not that our gullible faither media was planning to pursue this.
Why don't you spring for a long distance call or hop on a plane and interview her in person and report back your findings, instead of making such inane presumptions.