To: aimhigh
You will also note that the title of the bill has nothing to do with the text of the bill. They gutted the old language and inserted new text. But they kept the old title to ensure no one would find it. Scumbags.
2 posted on
08/13/2010 7:55:57 PM PDT by
aimhigh
To: Cindy; AliVeritas
21 posted on
08/13/2010 8:26:56 PM PDT by
mojo114
(On to November.)
To: aimhigh
The title of the bill is hilarious. It looks like it was restrained by PayGo, which is why all of the recisions, sunsets, and other modifications were included. I wonder if it was easier to get it passed from a parliamentary standpoint by paying for it this way, or if the last emergency measure they passed (which was immune from PayGo) caused too much bad publicity with the Republicans showing a little bit of spine.
Anyway, thanks for posting the bill. I feel more educated having read it. :)
27 posted on
08/13/2010 8:57:23 PM PDT by
andyk
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson