Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

Before modern means of travel, I wonder if it was impractical to convene a lame duck Congress, and if that’s why the authors of the Constitution did not worry about it.


2 posted on 08/13/2010 7:33:58 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I’d say that’s exactly it, the session was strictly for a national emergency.


3 posted on 08/13/2010 7:40:46 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It was no threat because the majority seldom consisted of zealots. The question is: if the Dim take a thumping in November, will the more moderate ones let Plelosi get away with a coup de main?


4 posted on 08/13/2010 7:43:30 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The Lame Duck Session seems to have earned its reputation from that oversight. One would guess that the powerful original states could scurry back down to DC quickly and make a quorum before the coaches rolled in from the west or the south.


8 posted on 08/13/2010 8:52:10 PM PDT by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson