Taitz threatens them, much as Sarah Palin does, because her response to a threat to the survival of her family is to fight, using the laws of the society she has joined. She escaped Moldavia, where the majority of Jews had been purged during and after WWII, for Israel, and, while a striking beauty who could have picked a wealthy husband, went to University and obtained a degree in dentistry, and dental surgery.
Having emigrated to the U.S., established a thriving practice, and while raising three children, she studied law and passed the California Bar, all while also obtaining a broker's license and selling real estate. That is why she, like Sarah Palin, is such a threat to the dependent sloths of the left. She didn't ask for special grants, a subplot of Obama’s life; she worked ferociously, and succeeded. That's why the parasites are so resentful.
Taitz was the first (that this writer heard in Dec 2008) to gently correct the impression given by the persuasive speaker and long time Democratic operative, Phillip Berg, that Obama was de facto illegitimate because of his alien father. Berg always avoided John Jay, John Marshall, Waite, Hamiliton and 14th Amendment Bingham. (Berg may still be working for the party, though he is described as a Hillary supporter). She didn't see others picking up the ball, so she did. That really aroused the parasites anticipating the spoils of the promised redistribution of the wealth created by the doers.
She knows tyranny. She lived in tyranny through her teen years. She isn't bothered by the childish name callers. Anyone who has tackled projects knows there is a learning curve. Some dive in and make mistakes to learn. Some think for a long time, and then dive in, perhaps making fewer mistakes, but also showing little progress while they deliberate. Some are afraid of mistakes and never do anything. Taitz probably mostly did real estate contracts, and took on federal courts and the supreme court. Experienced attorneys will of course find fault with her technique. But none dared take it on, and many criticized her legal skills. They may have felt battling the government put too much at risk, particularly given the non-productive nature, and dependence upon the government largess of the legal profession. Taitz knows from very personal experience that the government is the risk.
Taitz uncovered Obama's social security anomalies, which at first seemed a distraction, but are now beginning to show the shape of the key to Obama's past. She caused Obama’s personal, and now, White House Defense Counsel, Bob Bauer, to insert one of his staff into the staff of Federal Judge Carter, who had promised Taitz discovery. To force a retired Marine into a bald faced lie showed who had the courage of convictionss. She has exposed how nasty the rot in government is.
She discovered that her pleadings were being managed off the supreme court docket by clerks who presumably have no authority. Certainly, such clerks may be under orders by the court, which, as Clarence Thomas pointed out, is “evading the issue.”
Taitz went further to expose some rot in the purportedly conservative media by running for Secretary of State in California, because that office should have insisted upon some assurance that Obama was eligible. She immediately got a primary opponent, Damon Dunn, who, eight months before was a registered Democrat in both Florida and Texas, and a self described admirer of Obama. (He claimed he never voted, but had the forsight to ask the Florida Sec. State to expunge his record.) Thus far, Roger Hedgcock and Brian Sussman have pitched Dunn questions soundling more like Chris Mathews to Obama, enthralled with his football career and rise from rags to riches. The Democrats, of course, probably don't expect Jason Dunn to be any more than a spoiler, since a million voters for Taitz are more likely to write her name in than vote for a fraud, newly minted Republican or not. The usual voter fraud in California, with many testifying that write in ballots disappeared, or blocks of votes were miscounted, was palpable. Taitz would have cleaned that up, requiring photo ID, purging dead people, and investigating suspicious duplicate write-in ballots.
Taitz knows well that Secretaries of State are an office targeted by a new Soros NGO. Soros knows that a complete coup requires contolling what remains of the already compromised election process. It takes time and money to accomplish reversals such as those in Washington State and Minnesota. Better to fix the count up front where counts have abolutely no audit trail, or, in many states including California, no requirement for voter ID. We, as usual, are funding our own destruction. Taitz, frustrated by the corruption of the judicial system, figured she could protect her adopted nation, and its almost unique guarantee of individual freedom by helping to make elections honest.
Taitz is a hero, doing battle because, like most naturalized citizens, she understands and appreciates our Constitution better than most native born citizens of the U.S. - the term Obama uses to describe his own citizenship, and a classification ineligible for the presidency. Taitz, like Obama and McCain, is not currently - without an amendment to Article II - eligible to be president, but from the frantic personal attacks, she is having remarkable success doing battle with this one.
I have wondered why Orly stirs such ire on FR. Obamabots who can only disparage her efforts. The trouble is with the courts, not Orly.
barbra ann
“Taitz is a hero, doing battle because, like most naturalized citizens, she understands and appreciates our Constitution better than most native born citizens of the U.S. - the term Obama uses to describe his own citizenship, and a classification ineligible for the presidency. Taitz, like Obama and McCain, is not currently - without an amendment to Article II - eligible to be president, but from the frantic personal attacks, she is having remarkable success doing battle with this one. “
Spaulding: Thank you.
bootless: Ping.
Excellent post Spaulding.
I see the same qualities you do and the same vituperative reaction from the lefties.
Another woman with balls.
Wow....an excellent post Spaulding...thank you
Just perplexes me how Taitz even gets attacked by so-called “conservatives”....many who spent the Clinton era chasing around women’s clothes with his semen on it.
Unlike the Clinton shenanigans (which were moral and legislative law issues....not Consititutional qualification issues)....Obama’s being legal to serve is an issue totally rooted in the Constitution...and it is pretty well spelled out
Interesting that Taitz is more willing to follow and enforce our Constitution more than some of the radio talkers who spend hours a week discussing the same Constitution
Thanks for posting that. Your comments about the SoS’s is really on point. I think one of the biggest issues is that corruption is far more widespread than most people are willing to accept or believe. The progressives of both parties have done a heck of a job convincing people that the corruption they see is just one of so many ‘isolated incidents’.
bump
Taitz is, I’m sure, a fine woman.
However, she’s a lousy lawyer, given to bouts of hyperbole. Calling Judge Land a traitor in a brief addressed to him is just, well, stupid.