Because Clinton is a liar, as everyone knows, so I clearly cannot believe that he didn't try to bribe Sestak out of the race.
Because Clinton is a liar, as everyone knows, so I clearly cannot believe that he didn't try to bribe Sestak out of the race.
Don't you think our illustrious free but cynical and adversarial press should look into it?
ROFL! Nah, I suppose not.
LMAO
Oh yea, Hillary is about to burn Obummer...what do you want to bet?
“I did not bribe that man... mr. sestak”.
LLS
The clintons lie about everything. They have no more credibility than hussein IMHO.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2569452/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2569453/posts#comment
...even though Sestak is on tape saying it was a very short conversation about it.
Why did he wait so long to deny this? Hmmmmmm.
Clinton, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs
Yaaah, I mean REALLY...what’s one more lie in the myriad of falsehoods for Clinton.....pffffffh
“Clinton made the denials three times”
He denied the messiah 3 times? Where have I heard that before?
;)
Clinton didn’t deny offering him a position (unpaid, of course). All he’s saying now is he wasn’t involved in any quid pro quo. Clinton and Obama have plausible deniability. Sestak does not.
Well... either Clinton is lying... or the White House Counsel is lying:
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Sestak_Memorandum.pdf
In a TV court of law, ONE lie and you can’t be believed about anything from then on so how is Clintoon any different? heehee
He should never be in any position of power again.
I never believed the WH’s story. Makes no sense that Rahm would solicit Clinton to offer Sestak (or anyone) an unpaid position. Besides, Clinton would have known that Sestak was ineligible for the appointment in question. For all his faults, he’s a lot smarter than the current crew in the WH.