So what one did he use? The Connecticut Social Security number? Why don’t you show us what one that one was?
And while you’re at it show us the Social Security number that Obama used to work at Baskin Robbins in 1975.
It is strange though that if Obama truly has more than one Social Security number that not one single member of Congress has raised the issue and called for Congressional hearings on the subject. At least there should have been a Senate Ethics committee investigation.
I found the following information from doing a Google search on “Obama Social Security numbers,” I quote:
“Finding Social Security Numbers: If you have a person’s name, you may be able to look up his or her social security numbers using Accurint, Merlin, KnowX and/or LocatePlus. However, you may want to check with the company first, because the number may be masked for privacy purposes. Merlin is said to be more willing to provide complete social security numbers if a business can demonstrate a permissible use.
The data are collected from a variety of resources and the public data clearly contains many false positives when people submit loan applications, credit card applications, sign up for utilities, enroll in College, etc. under presumed names or SSN’s. Furthermore, there is a real risk of transcription errors.
For instance with the SSN which President Obama has been using, there are three entries for the data: 1890, August 4, 1961, and April, 6 1961. While there is a minor mystery why the SSN was granted in the State of Connecticut, the public database shows that President Obama has been using this number for quite a few years, and the addresses largely reflect the addresses of his residence, or work addresses. The 08/04 and 04/08 transposition in the month/day is also easily understandable, but what about the ’1890’ entry? Since there is no entry found for this number and a name different from Obama’s, the logical conclusion is that this date is a data fluke. It is predictable that “1890” reflects: No Entry.
The following data explains: Note how both records point to the same person, living at the same address, one with a valid DOB, the other with ’1890’
Name – OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
Gender – Male
Street Address – 365 BROADWAY APT B1
City, State, Zip – SOMERVILLE MA 02145-2440
Probable Current Address – No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security – 042-68-xxxx
Age – 119
Date of Birth – 1890
Deceased – No
Date Record Verified -
Name – OBAMA, BARACK H
Gender – Male
Street Address – 365 BROADWAY APT B1
City, State, Zip – SOMERVILLE MA 02145-2440
Probable Current Address – No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security – 042-68-xxxx
Age – 47
Date of Birth – Aug 04, 1961
Deceased – No
Date Record Verified -
The final arbiter of social security numbers, is the Social Security Administration who can check how the actual SSN is being used. And, given the lack of their interest in pursuing this ‘mystery’, it is likely that their databases show that President Obama has been using a single SSN all along, and that this number, contrary to the claims, was never assigned to anyone else but the President.”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/educating-the-confused-public-ssn-databases/
I would also add that none of the Obama eligibility lawsuits that have presented multiple Social Security number questions in their briefs for judges has gained any more judicial traction than the lawsuits that omit those charges. When a plaintiff lacks legal standing to sue, the lawsuit stops there.
The way to investigate this issue and all others concerning Obama’s eligibility is through a Grand Jury investigation or through a congressional investigation. Both Grand Juries and Congressional committees have subpoena power.
Of course you don't know but you bring up some Obama presidential financial form with a SS number in a previous post that supposedly tells us what? His genuine SS number?? Like he really has one. We know that Obama used that Connecticut SS number as it matches his Selective Service Registration SS number.
It is strange though that if Obama truly has more than one Social Security number that not one single member of Congress has raised the issue and called for Congressional hearings on the subject. At least there should have been a Senate Ethics committee investigation.
Whaaa you want Obama investigated? Sure you do /sarcasm. Dem rats will hardly investigate their Commie president. You should have more than a little clue that Obama has been given a pass on just about everything. It is the same pass that this society and its government (led by the main stream press) that gives him for his lies and his lack of natural born citizenship status. We know that many in the Obama administration have cheated on their taxes so what have Congress or the IRS done to punish these clowns - nada thing.
The data are collected from a variety of resources and the public data clearly contains many false positives when people submit loan applications, credit card applications, sign up for utilities, enroll in College, etc. under presumed names or SSN’s. Furthermore, there is a real risk of transcription errors.
Obama has a lot of false positives. I doubt that the Social Security numbers that come up as hits are false positives. About 2007 on forward, the Demo-rat operatives flooded Obama name variations and "false positives" to records so to dilute the problem of Obama misusing SS numbers. The classic hide the needle in the haystack of BS records in an attempt to hide Obama's fraud.
Then we have a two year gap between 1975 and 1977 [through 1979] when the Connecticut social security number was issued to someone. Obama could not have used a SS number issued in 1977 when he was scooping ice cream in 1975 at Baskin-Robbins.
but what about the ’1890’ entry? Since there is no entry found for this number and a name different from Obama’s, the logical conclusion is that this date is a data fluke. It is predictable that “1890” reflects: No Entry.
Or Obama's Grandma or Momma got hold of a social security number that was issued to a person who was really born in 1890 for whatever reason not until his late 80s because he did not need one early in life. Pretty slick.