Not arguing with your rather crude suggestion, but it would be worse with White. Our problem is that we have no choice.
Well I've come around to believe that, when presented with such an unacceptable choice, the worse of the two evils is always the Judas who's in our midsts. Yes, White is bad... but at least we know it up front without being fooled by all the smoke and mirrors. THAT I can put up with much more than being constantly backstabbed by someone who only claims to be on "our" side.
Whoever wins the governor’s office also oversees redistricting next year. As crooked as Rick Perry is, he has experience dealing with redistricting battles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Texas_redistricting
He can also be counted on to look out for his own best interests, which, in this case, means gerrymandering if necessary for the GOP.
That’s best for the 2012 elections, and that’s why I will hold my nose and vote for Perry.
“Well I’ve come around to believe that, when presented with such an unacceptable choice, the worse of the two evils is always the Judas who’s in our midsts. Yes, White is bad... but at least we know it up front without being fooled by all the smoke and mirrors”
It’s idiotic thinking like that which led to Obama as President.
Perry has been a good Governor, presiding over the best economy of large states, keeping Texas fiscally sound and standing up for the state. He’s been a solid conservative who has vetoed many bad bills and passed many good bills.
Yes, White is bad. Perry is good. Vote for Perry. End of story.