Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Biggirl

If you actually read the 14th there is no Anchor Baby provision at all. It’s a fiction, a lefty one.

Plus, go back and read the floor debates during ratification.

No need for an amendment to the amendment.


7 posted on 08/11/2010 6:20:25 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow
No need for an amendment to the amendment.

The 14th Amendment grants to Congress the responsibility to determine what "under the jurisdiction thereof" really means.

Thus, Congress can undo what the Supreme Court hath wrought.

11 posted on 08/11/2010 6:36:57 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson