Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
I have still yet to hear any compelling arguments for redefining marraige. Not a one.
15 posted on 08/10/2010 5:08:58 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Sarah Palin: America's last, best hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NurdlyPeon

The whole purpose is to let “gays” collect surviving spouse social security, half the pension, life insurance benefits, and all the other stuff that married couples can get. It’s all about the money. Oh, and it’s also about hatred of the “breeders”, whom the more militant gay folks seem to hold in contempt despite the fact that their own parents were breeders (unfortunately, perhaps).


17 posted on 08/10/2010 5:14:53 PM PDT by meyer (Our own government has become our enemy,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: NurdlyPeon

Amen. I don’t know if you saw Ted Olson on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace last Sunday but his main argument and talking point was “discrimination”. He must have said it a dozen times. I kept waiting for Wallace to ask him how traditional marriage laws discriminate when EVERYONE can get married. Of course he never asked him and let him ramble on about “discrimination” three or four more times.


22 posted on 08/11/2010 12:40:34 AM PDT by snowflake2428
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson