Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
Dear thackney,

The author recognizes your point, but states that to get significantly more diesel per barrel, it would require replacing all our existing refineries. What do you think of that comment?

What's implied in YOUR post is that getting as much gasoline out of the barrel as we do is a result of using EXTRA refining equipment. Could refineries be re-tooled by removing that extra equipment from the process? Or is the author not too far off?

Thanks,


sitetest

16 posted on 08/09/2010 10:41:24 AM PDT by sitetest ( If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
to get significantly more diesel per barrel, it would require replacing all our existing refineries

Portions of the refinery would be replaced but not the whole refinery. For example, typical Cat Crackers would be replaced with VGO units and the like but the desalter, atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation units would be unchanged.

What's implied in YOUR post is that getting as much gasoline out of the barrel as we do is a result of using EXTRA refining equipment. Could refineries be re-tooled by removing that extra equipment from the process?

If you only removed the equipment, we would be left with a lot of low value product like residual oil (bunker fuel) that has little use and value. Instead, subsequent processing units downstream of the distillation units breakdown the low-value, high-BTU, heavy oil into more desired products. Different markets desire different ratios of products.

19 posted on 08/09/2010 10:47:13 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson