Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amos Rucker--A Soldier Remembered
Canada Free Press ^ | August 8, 2010 | Calvin E. Johnson, Jr.

Posted on 08/08/2010 4:20:05 PM PDT by BigReb555

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 901-917 next last
To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; stainlessbanner; Idabilly; southernsunshine; central_va
Hi Cowboyway! That Zak fellow sure was posting a lot of junk revisionist history, wasn’t he? Poor idiot. I used to just as dumb as he was about the war until I did some reading and research. It all started when I watched a documentary called “Warriors of Honor” about Lee and Jackson. Before that, I was just an idiot and was ashamed of my state. Anyway, If you come across any good civil war threads please ping me and we can fight the idiot yanks together. :)

Revisionism is a great yankee tradition that's been handed down from father to son since 1865.

Check out The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Civil War if you get a chance. It explodes a lot of the yankee mythology about the War of Northern Aggression.

Stainlessbanner keeps the official (((ping))) list and I'm sure that he will be glad to put you on it but there are a few of us that ping each other and since you appear to be battle ready and eager to charge the yankee Fortress of Lies I'm sure that you'll be getting pinged plenty for all future engagements.

End the Occupation!
Free Dixie!!

61 posted on 08/09/2010 12:29:46 PM PDT by cowboyway (Molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

You might notice that every soldier in your picture is wearing full Union army uniforms. That’s because it’s actually a picture of a USCT outfit.


62 posted on 08/09/2010 1:22:36 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Is this the man for whom Ft. Rucker is named?

No that was named for Edmund Rucker, former confederate colonel and local Birmingham bigwig. Maybe he owned Amos at one time?

63 posted on 08/09/2010 1:25:37 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

Hope you punctuated your paper better than your post.


64 posted on 08/09/2010 1:28:07 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
1. The “Richmond Howitzers” were partially manned by black militiamen. They saw action at 1st Manassas (or 1st Battle of Bull Run) where they operated battery no. 2.

According to this website the 2nd company of the Richmond Howitzers was not present at Bull Run.

In addition two black “regiments”, one free and one slave, participated in the battle on behalf of the South. “Many colored people were killed in the action”, recorded John Parker, a former slave.

Here is a link to the confederate order of battle for 1st Bull Run. Can you please identify which were the black regiments? Extra credit if you can tell us which was the slave one and which was the free one.

At least one Black Confederate was a non-commissioned officer in Co. D 35th Texas Cavalry,

Frederick Douglass' son was one of thousands of blac NCOs in the Union army. And there was only one NCO in all the confederate army? With all those thousands of black combat troops claimed?

Dr. Lewis Steiner, Chief Inspector of the United States Sanitary Commission while observing Gen. “Stonewall” Jackson’s occupation of Frederick, Maryland, in 1862: “Over 3,000 Negroes must be included in this number [Confederate troops]. These were clad in all kinds of uniforms, not only in cast-off or captured United States uniforms, but in coats with Southern buttons, State buttons, etc. These were shabby, but not shabbier or seedier than those worn by white men in the rebel ranks. Most of the Negroes had arms, rifles, muskets, sabers, bowie-knives, dirks, etc.....and were manifestly an integral portion of the Southern Confederate Army.”

Dr. Steiner went on to say, "The fact was patent, and rather interesting when considered in connection with the horror rebels express at the suggestion of black soldiers being employed for the National defence." If blacks were accepted as combatants and brothers-in-arms in the confederate army then why would the react with horror at the thought of meeting them in battle?

In 1864, President Jefferson Davis approved a plan that proposed the emancipation of slaves, in return for the official recognition of the Confederacy by Britain and France. France showed interest but Britain refused.

How could Davis promise to emancipate the slaves in the confederacy when he lacked the constitutional authority to do so? And why is it when the confederate congress finally got around to authorizing black combat troops they specifically excluded any promise of emancipation in exchange for service?

Gen. Lee was anxious to receive regiments of black soldiers.

Was he? In January 1865 he wrote, "Considering the relation of master and slave, controlled by humane laws and influenced by Christianity and an enlightened public sentiment, as the best that can exist between the white and black races while intermingled as at present in this country, I would deprecate any sudden disturbance of that relation unless it be necessary to avert a greater calamity to both. I should therefore prefer to rely upon our white population to preserve the ratio between our forces and those of the enemy, which experience has shown to be safe."

65 posted on 08/09/2010 1:47:48 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
I used to just as dumb as he was about the war until I did some reading and research.

Should have done a little more...

66 posted on 08/09/2010 1:49:38 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

According to this website the 2nd company of the Richmond Howitzers was not present at Bull Run.”

Yeah, it was a conspiracy by Harpers to mislead the public. Hey, there’s a link on www.liberalsmakingshitup.com that syas Eleanor Roosevelt could fly...that’s how we won the war!


67 posted on 08/09/2010 1:51:27 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

According to this website the 2nd company of the Richmond Howitzers was not present at Bull Run.”

Yeah, it was a conspiracy by Harpers to mislead the public. Hey, there’s a link on www.liberalsmakingshitup.com that says Eleanor Roosevelt could fly...that’s how we won the war!


68 posted on 08/09/2010 1:51:39 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Are you one of the editors there or just a contributor?


69 posted on 08/09/2010 1:54:02 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; stainlessbanner; BigReb555; norton; Colonel Kangaroo

Yes, indeed. Those African-American soldiers joined the Union Army, after the CSA refused to accept them.


70 posted on 08/09/2010 1:55:51 PM PDT by Michael Zak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
Surely men like this are being celebrated in history classes across the US public schools system in all due reverence to the sacred principles of Diversity.

There's a reason why it was kept secret.

black confederates

71 posted on 08/09/2010 1:55:53 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Dr. Steiner went on to say, “The fact was patent, and rather interesting when considered in connection with the horror rebels express at the suggestion of black soldiers being employed for the National defence.” If blacks were accepted as combatants and brothers-in-arms in the confederate army then why would the react with horror at the thought of meeting them in battle?”

I never said they were swapping spit, I just said you all are outright liars when you deny they fought. The good doctor (and you, apparently) prove that you are liars.


72 posted on 08/09/2010 1:56:14 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“Are you one of the editors there or just a contributor?”

I’m the one who proves what liars you all are when you get on this “no blacks ever served” campaign.


73 posted on 08/09/2010 1:58:49 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Here is a link to the confederate order of battle for 1st Bull Run. Can you please identify which were the black regiments? Extra credit if you can tell us which was the slave one and which was the free one.”

And that could be done, how? They had regular names then. There weren’t any John Muhammeds.


74 posted on 08/09/2010 2:01:23 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You might notice that every soldier in your picture is wearing full Union army uniforms. That’s because it’s actually a picture of a USCT outfit.”

USCT Outfit? What, you Yankees didn’t want to be with the Negroes? You great Emancipators?


75 posted on 08/09/2010 2:03:33 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Frederick Douglass’ son was one of thousands of blac NCOs in the Union army. And there was only one NCO in all the confederate army? With all those thousands of black combat troops claimed?”

Lucky boy ... no one claimed that there were “thousands” ... but that the blacks who fought were, for the most part, “unofficially” combatants ... it was you ass hats claimed there were no NCO’s ... so ... you were wrong again, huh?


76 posted on 08/09/2010 2:08:24 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Michael Zak

Yeah and the Union gave them choice assignments like Crater and Dead Angle. The non-soldiers were left to scavange behind Sherman’s war train or banned from northern towns by law.


77 posted on 08/09/2010 2:09:15 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

In January 1865 (Lee) wrote, “Considering the relation of master and slave, controlled by humane laws and influenced by Christianity and an enlightened public sentiment, as the best that can exist between the white and black races while intermingled as at present in this country, I would deprecate any sudden disturbance of that relation unless it be necessary to avert a greater calamity to both. I should therefore prefer to rely upon our white population to preserve the ratio between our forces and those of the enemy, which experience has shown to be safe.”

Typical of the General who has to deal with politics. Not unlike Petreaus today, I believe he would have done things differently had he been able to.

Robert E. Lee vigorously opposed slavery and as early as 1856 made this statement: “There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil.”

Robert E. Lee did not own slaves. When his father-in-law died, Lee took over the management of the plantation his wife had inherited and immediately began freeing the slaves. By the time Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, every slave in Lee’s charge had been freed.

Notably, US Grant DID own a slave and didn’t free HIS slaves until 1865.


78 posted on 08/09/2010 2:15:25 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

When do you plan on doing that?


79 posted on 08/09/2010 2:15:54 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

“When do you plan on doing that?”

When do you plan on disproving anything? Or are you just the comic relief in the Southern Bashers Show?


80 posted on 08/09/2010 2:19:56 PM PDT by jessduntno (I wonder...how will third Manassas turn out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 901-917 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson