Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
Clearly this is Rat output (I am so heavy hearted to see Sensenbrenner in the list)

As the rule was promulgated by the State Legislature and, thus, signed by Gov. Doyle -- you can certainly blame Doyle and the 'Rats in the legislature.

However, I've no idea why the author included the Senators and Congressmen. They couldn't vote on it. Perhaps, Feingold, Kohl and the 'Rat Congressmen were pushing for it, but they can't be held responsible.

On the other hand, there is no way Sensenbrenner, Ryan and Petri would've (or could've) played any role in this.

37 posted on 08/06/2010 9:07:52 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

......”On the other hand, there is no way Sensenbrenner, Ryan and Petri would’ve (or could’ve) played any role in this.”

Your point is taken – the list should have included state legislators or whomever appointed the board.

The procedural process enables the BOARD TO CREATE the legislation, and if the house doesn’t challenge it, it becomes law. That’s what was sort of described on the GAO website.

http://gab.wi.gov/node/1252

So what this means is that the WI senate passed it, and the WI house failed to act on it and their inaction made it law... which is why the house is to blame as well. Don’t forget that it’s possible the house didn’t act on it because they WANTED it to be passed into law.

Why is a board given this kind of power? That is what needs to be questioned.
Laws should begin in the legislature and this could also apply to the stimulus and health care bill which were created by someone other than lawmakers.

This should be something on the “to do” list along with term limits, etc. but not just at the federal level, also the (appointed) boards in these state legislatures need to be reviewed.

In this document dated March 23 2010, it refers to the supreme court case regarding campaign finance and stated that a review of the SCOTUS case was requested before continuing. This process began in 2009 and this document shows the original wording with changes noted using a strike-through.

http://gab.wi.gov/sites/default/files/news/rule_gab_1_28_memo_to_board_march_2010_pdf_91828.pdf

There is something going on in WI with elections – check out this article – not exactly related, but I bet there is more to this story.

Federal court rejects Wisconsin legislative candidate’s lawsuit over expletive

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/05/federal-court-rejects-wisconsin-legislative-candidates-lawsuit-expletive/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign


41 posted on 08/06/2010 9:30:44 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: okie01

Paul Ryan????

Paul Ryan has some questions to answer. What IS going on?


49 posted on 08/06/2010 10:07:09 PM PDT by itssme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson