Again, deductive reasoning must be outside your intellectual grasp. I'm not surprised. The only reason to see the birth certificate is to verify the Hawaiian birth. If you want to verify Hawaiian birth, then you must not believe Obama was born in HI. It's not that complicated, except to you, apparently.
Did Lakin refuse to deploy during George Bush's presidency, or did George send Lakin a personally signed copy of his birth certificate, just because? 'Contend away!"
Of course, my "contention" has prevailed in no less than 60 of these birther cases. How about that?
"That is your assumption. The case hasn't even been heard."
That's my presumption based upon 25-years of practicing military law. I haven't seen a single former military lawyer publicly opine that Lakin stands even a remote chance of prevailing at trial. The case is a loser, and any JAG - even those with the "new uniform smell" - could have told Lakin the exact same thing.
Larkin also wins by losing. You lose.
If you want to verify Hawaiian birth, then you must not believe Obama was born in HI.
Well, you see, that's just it. Nobody can verify anything. I have no idea where he was born as there is nothing to look at. I'm either just supposed to take his word for it or believe some image on the Internet. Which are you going to do?
Of course, my "contention" has prevailed in no less than 60 of these birther cases. How about that?
That means you spend a lot of time on eligibility threads and thoroughly believe that you're right about everything and nobody else could be right nor should they hold an opinion different from yours.
That's my presumption based upon 25-years of practicing military law.
presumption
2 a : an attitude or belief dictated by probability : assumption