[philman_36]

So, annnnnyway...
Do you still contend that such a situation makes such a person a natural born citizen and qualifies them to be POTUS despite the copious amount of information that states otherwise?

[OldDeckHand]

"Do you still contend that such a situation makes such a person a natural born citizen and qualifies them to be POTUS despite the copious amount of information that states otherwise? "

This thread is about Lakin's court-martial. Your question is plainly irrelevant to Lakin's court-martial, or so will hold the military judge in a pre-trial hearing when he rules - as a matter of law - the deployment order was a lawful order.

[tired_old_conservative]

So, annnnnyway... Do you still contend that such a situation makes such a person a natural born citizen and qualifies them to be POTUS despite the copious amount of information that states otherwise?

Yep.

Based on: (1) a recent court decision (the only one specifically noting an answer to that question, even though it wasn't asked); (2) a clear historical and legal line of argument reaching back to the origins of this country that "born here" is good enough; (3) the fact of Obama not being born to two citizen parents being a stipulated fact before the election, with not a single election official, elector, congressperson, or Dick Cheney objecting.

I'll take that over a bunch of out-of-context, cut-and-paste hack work.

And Old Deck Hand is right. None of that is relevant to the Lakin case, which will proceed to conviction without the need to investigate any of it.