Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hiroshima 65 years later: US attends ceremony, but offers no apology
CS Monitor ^ | August 6, 2010 | Gavin Blair

Posted on 08/06/2010 7:59:03 AM PDT by americanophile

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: SpitfyrAce

Besides, I would consider all the money we spent rebuilding the country as “Payment in Full.”


61 posted on 08/06/2010 9:18:41 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Radagast the Fool

“How about the same time we get an apology for Pearl Harbor

And the Bataan Death March!!”

They attacked us first, therefore they should apologize first. Bunch of sniveling little hypocrites.


62 posted on 08/06/2010 9:19:14 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

No I am not....Just pointing out where this all began...JAPAN, not as your post would suggest, with US.


63 posted on 08/06/2010 9:28:20 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT
This is my point too. Has Japan ever sent a 'delegation' to Pearl Harbor for Dec. 7th? Has the Japanese Emperor ever issued an official apology for Pearl, the Bataan Death Mark, etc?

I have nothing against Japanese people, we were at war and both sides did what they justified was necessary to win.

Last time I looked at pictures, Hiroshima is a thriving, bustling modern city, not some radiated wasteland.

64 posted on 08/06/2010 9:29:49 AM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Radagast the Fool
And the Bataan Death March!!

The Japanese Ambassador to the United States did so, directly to the U.S. survivors:

Japan Apologizes for Bataan Death March: Ambassador Speaks to Last 73 American Survivors of the March

There's a list of some 50 apologies that the Japanese have made since the Pacific War here.

(That list includes reference to a story that the Emperor had intended to apologize for the war (including explicitly the attack on Pearl) at MacArthur aide: U.S. must learn from errors. I don't believe that there are any other references to this story in any standard work on the war, so I take that particular article with a large grain of salt.)

65 posted on 08/06/2010 9:44:42 AM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

The japanese had ever intention of fighting for every inch of japan. They called it operation keshuga.

Estimates for the invasion handed to Truman before his decision to use the bomb:

US casualties: 1.75 to 4 million
Japanese casualties: 10 million minimum. Could have been 30 million including combat, starvation and disease.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Japan was still capable of doing massive damage at the end of the war.


66 posted on 08/06/2010 10:02:26 AM PDT by texmexis best (My)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Not true. An invasion was not necessary. The Japanese (who were being strangled by the blockade) were ready to agree to a conditional surrender (thus avoiding an invasion) BEFORE the bombs were dropped.

Certainly some Japanese realized the war was lost. Not all did. There was a (nearly successful) plot by the army to prevent the surrender after the bombs were dropped. There were American POWs in enemy hands dying every day. The Japanese were planning to release plague in Southern California (which we did not know at the time). Even if a surrender could have been effected without further combat deaths (which I doubt), American lives were still saved by our dropping the bomb and Japan's immediate surrender.

67 posted on 08/06/2010 10:05:22 AM PDT by magslinger (DISCLAIMER: No liberals were harmed in the making of this post. I'm sorry and will try harder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Its all Iffy History. What if the assassination attempt on the emperor succeeded? Old ladies and Babies?? Ya mean like in Dresden, Berlin, Hamburg, where there were also a lot of good christians? The fire bombing of Tokyo was probably equal to the A Bombs. Yeah, like it would have made a difference.


68 posted on 08/06/2010 10:23:21 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

It was not necessary to INTENTIONALLY violate the ancient rules of war by INTENTIONALLY kill thousands of babies and little old ladies (many who lived in Nagasaki, the heart of Japanese Christianity) solely to promote terror...............................................................Its all Iffy History. What if the assassination attempt on the emperor succeeded? Old ladies and Babies?? Ya mean like in Dresden, Berlin, Hamburg, where there were also a lot of good christians? The fire bombing of Tokyo was probably equal to the A Bombs. Yeah, like it would have made a difference.


69 posted on 08/06/2010 10:24:15 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

“It was not necessary to INTENTIONALLY violate the ancient rules of war by INTENTIONALLY kill thousands of babies and little old ladies (many who lived in Nagasaki, the heart of Japanese Christianity) solely to promote terror.”

I do believe the US dropped leaflets WEEKS before dropping the bomb on each city - telling them to leave the city or be destroyed! Therefore, we did not “INTENTIONALLY kill thousands of babies and little old ladies;” they failed to leave the area with forewarning of the impending attack.

I guess you think it was Bush’s fault that hundreds died during Katrina too?!?! You think this even though FEMA recommended to the local authorities that they have a mandatory evacuation - three days BEFORE Katrina hit! Katrina upgraded from a Cat3 to a Cat5 in less than two days and local authorities STILL did not demand a mandatory evacuation until less than 24 hours before the storm actually made landfall!

Nice revision of history or are you just choosing to ignore it?


70 posted on 08/06/2010 10:36:56 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Hey Congress: Go Conservative or Go home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

They started it...we finished it...end of story.


71 posted on 08/06/2010 10:38:53 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarGI

Emperor Hirohito did go to the Arizona Memorial when he visited the US in 1975.


72 posted on 08/06/2010 10:44:30 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: River_Wrangler
This was the last war that we won.

Well there was Grenada.

73 posted on 08/06/2010 10:48:11 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Anyone know the time conversion (including Intl Dateline adjustment) between US Central and Japan for 9am CT on Aug 5th?

Because THAT was the time that the only flyable B-29 in the world, the CAF's FIFI, took to the air for the first time since 2004.
74 posted on 08/06/2010 11:52:10 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Thank you, snowsislander, for the links. It is very interesting!


75 posted on 08/07/2010 12:57:42 PM PDT by Radagast the Fool ("Mexico-Beirut with tacos!"--Dr. Zoidberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Radagast the Fool
Thank you, snowsislander, for the links. It is very interesting!

You are most welcome.

As I said in posting #65, I would take the third link, MacArthur aide: U.S. must learn from errors, with a big grain of salt. I don't know of any standard work on the aftermath of the Pacific War that substantiates that story. The events sound at least plausible, but the lack of other corroborating sources makes it at best dubious in my opinion.

76 posted on 08/07/2010 2:02:22 PM PDT by snowsislander (In this election year, please ask your candidates if they support repeal of the 1968 GCA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson