Posted on 08/06/2010 7:02:35 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Not for nothing but I think these illegals should live in fear.Who the hell do they think they are coming here and sucking the life out of the taxpayers.
The sooner they all leave the better for us all.
Not for nothing but I think these illegals should live in fear.Who the hell do they think they are coming here and sucking the life out of the taxpayers.
The sooner they all leave the better for us all.
Enjoy and share with your elected member of the Ruling Class:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWpOcZVnBrc
kids legal, mommy is not? Unless dad (not mentioned) is legal, the kid is illegal to. The whole anchor baby thing needs to be addressed. And NOT in a Lindsey Gram sort of way.
There is an easy way to fix it - GO HOME!
Well the illegall aliens will have to keep their “mouthy” English speaking anchor babies in the shadows and away from the public eye places like schools, welfare offices and the Obamas wont they ???
It seems that ABC is protecting the identity of the family.
I should ad that I LOVE the fact that at least that family is blaming Obama for trying to kick them out of the country.
Man just can’t win with anyone these days.
Could ABC “News” do a story telling Americans which country they can enter illegally, then live and work in illegally and not “live in fear?”
I’m sure the people who had their identity stolen so these folks could work are also living in fear
Under the very loose criteria of the Feds today (even before blatant de facto amnesty) being born in the USA means being anchored there. If rules really were followed, the parents would have to go back home anyhow and the child couldn’t sponsor them (”anchor”) until coming of age, some 21 years following his/her birth. But it’s like, now, “borders? what steenking borders?”
“undocumented” is such a dumb term. I understand they don’t want to say that awful word “illegal,” but undocumented sounds so lame, like the xerox machine broke down.
Unless it’s going on under the table, taken from a dead person, etc.
As much as I dislike M Obama and everything she stands for she did not out the family, the kid did.
She was granted amnesty (oh no, the WH says they had nothing to do with it).
Is she still living on welfare - or is Obama sponsoring her with support for her living expenses? I'm sure that Social Security payments & retirement benefits are part of the deal.
Or “gee, we found them all here on this shelf, but there are no tags!”
What about that cousin (?) of his living in the hut in Kenya?
If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.