Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Upstate NY Guy

Can someone please explain how, unemployment was expected to be 9.6% job creation was supposed to be 90,000,and buisness shed double the estimate at 171,000, but the unemployment number remains at 8.5%? Maybe it’s the new math, or someones cooking the books.


28 posted on 08/06/2010 7:08:39 AM PDT by VTenigma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VTenigma
Can someone please explain how, unemployment was expected to be 9.6% job creation was supposed to be 90,000,and buisness shed double the estimate at 171,000, but the unemployment number remains at 8.5%? Maybe it’s the new math, or someones cooking the books.

No, I don't think that someone is cooking the books. I believe the answer lies in the way the BLS compiles the data. You see, once a worker becomes discouraged and quits looking for work, he is no longer a part of the population surveyed for unemployment purposes. So, if a large group of workers stops looking, they are not counted. That would explain why the unemployment number stays the same in this instance.

Now, I think the media should report the unemployment percentage (collected by the BLS) which would show the true unemployment number to be maybe twice the official number.

43 posted on 08/06/2010 3:36:16 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson