Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: haroldeveryman

Neil Bortz hammered this today, making the argument that it doesn’t affect the REST OF US, so why bother them? But it’s when your daughter gets married, and the Father of the Bride is suppose to walk the gal up to the front and say HER MOTHER AND I? Which side does the brides mother, father, and who are the bridesmaids, and the Groomsmen...it is so yucky why can’t they be satisfied with a Civil Union, go make contract to the other be faithful, and leave HOLY MATRIMONY to the people who have testicles and uterus, and the very obvious natural way for milleniums have reproduced. Gosh.


25 posted on 08/05/2010 5:33:26 PM PDT by rovenstinez (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: rovenstinez

“why can’t they be satisfied with a Civil Union?”

Exactly. But as soon as it became apparent that gay “Civil Unions” were OK with most people, the left dropped the issue and started pushing for “gay marriage”. This is just another leftist deconstructionist maneuver to bring down another pillar of our culture. The target in this case the institution of marriage.


26 posted on 08/06/2010 11:52:16 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson