Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/05/2010 12:26:22 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


anyone else curious as to how much of the technology to build such a missile has been stolen or given to them via a Presidential approved technology waiver earlier on in the missile research&development programs run by the PRA?


2 posted on 08/05/2010 12:28:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I’m not sure why they need the Dong Feng 21D given the extent that we are in hock to them. I believe our vulnerable financial position alone will suffice to checkmate us should China decide to make any moves on Taiwan or S. Korea.


3 posted on 08/05/2010 12:29:20 PM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

You can thank Billy-boy Clinton and his administration for this development. Much of our technology was compromised during the time he was chasing quiff around the Oval Office. I went on a tour of China two years ago (I speak Mandarin thanks to the DLI at Monterey) and everyone I talked to just thought he was the best guy ever. They just loved Bill from Beijing to XiAn to Shanghai. Now I see why.


6 posted on 08/05/2010 12:32:05 PM PDT by harrym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Typical Chinese solution - a cheap, relatively easy, and dangerous.

These are balistic missiles. The US, and even the Russians, did not develop anti-ship ballistic missiles because their launch and trajectory can easily be mistaken for a nuclear missile launch.


9 posted on 08/05/2010 12:36:43 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Call me skeptical. Using a ballistic missile to track and hit a moving target seems like a task out of their reach. The weapon would need some sort of external source to update the trajectory.....perhaps a satellite, land based, or sea based system. In a conflict, that would be the weak point and the first thing to go.


10 posted on 08/05/2010 12:37:55 PM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Sounds like a few upgrades were made to the C-803 missile.


11 posted on 08/05/2010 12:40:19 PM PDT by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The answer is called the RIM-161 Standard Missile 3, aka SM-3:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM-3

It already exists. Its is already sitting in the VLS cells of Aegis class cruisers and destroyers.

The USN has problems (not the least of which is Obama), but it ain’t stupid and this is old news.


12 posted on 08/05/2010 12:45:08 PM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The Obama presidency has already guaranteed that China will be more powerful.


13 posted on 08/05/2010 12:51:03 PM PDT by newnhdad (The longest of journeys begins with one step.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
It strongly opposed plans to hold U.S.-South Korean war games in the Yellow Sea off the northeastern Chinese coast, saying the participation of the USS George Washington supercarrier, with its 1,092-foot (333-meter) flight deck and 6,250 personnel, would be a provocation because it put Beijing within striking range of U.S. F-18 warplanes. The carrier instead took part in maneuvers held farther away in the Sea of Japan. U.S. officials deny Chinese pressure kept it away, and say they will not be told by Beijing where they can operate. "We reserve the right to exercise in international waters anywhere in the world," Rear Adm. Daniel Cloyd, who headed the U.S. side of the exercises, said aboard the carrier during the maneuvers, which ended last week.

Obama wets his pants and backs down... again.

14 posted on 08/05/2010 12:51:16 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I am sure the AP is hoping for that


15 posted on 08/05/2010 12:51:50 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Naw man... we have FReepers that stated in a thread yesterday that china is the next America... that these Capitalists are creating the most free nation on earth. Truth is... they are still a bunch of maoist commie murderers.

LLS

30 posted on 08/05/2010 1:47:44 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

And this would stop us how? The super-carrier is not the thing China needs to worry about. The Seawolf and Virgina class subs are the difference makers.

How is the missile going to avoid the Aegis Phalanx? When bullets meets supersonic missile, physics take over.


31 posted on 08/05/2010 2:02:45 PM PDT by Azeem (The world will look up and shout "Save us!"... And I'll whisper "No.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

/


32 posted on 08/05/2010 2:08:59 PM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (1.416785(71) x 10^32 frwv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Take this with a grain of salt. This is the media that only found out the Gulf of Mexico oil spill was a Democrat hoax 104 days later than Rush Limbaugh.


35 posted on 08/05/2010 2:50:12 PM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't buy it.

Hitting a 3 x football field from 900miles away while it's traveling at 40knots...with a BALLISTIC missile?

And, it would have to penetrate AGEIS and Phallanx.

I call BS.

36 posted on 08/05/2010 3:47:55 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Thanks NormsRevenge.
...a game-changing weapon being developed by China -- an unprecedented carrier-killing missile called the Dong Feng 21D that could be launched from land with enough accuracy to penetrate the defenses of even the most advanced moving aircraft carrier at a distance of more than 1,500 kilometers (900 miles).
Just curious -- how many Chinese live downstreat of the Three Gorges Dam?
40 posted on 08/05/2010 6:31:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge


WALLMART + STUPID AMERICANS = THIS
43 posted on 08/06/2010 6:28:41 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson