Posted on 08/04/2010 3:21:44 PM PDT by Ripliancum
try”cram down your throat”
It appears that now we have lost much of the ballet box. The time for change thru “other means” is rapidly approaching
No kidding.
Where’s Mitt when we need him?
More like Beck.
Kill babies...teach faggery as a good thing...
On these issues, I find the laws and promotion of these acts against nature as disgusting.
When it goes to SCOTUS it will be 5-4 pro-gay marriage. Maybe the LDS will see the silver lining since using a materialistic explanation were forced to drop polygamy to allow Utah to be admitted as a state. Now they could back to how it was originally knowing the SCOTUS will watch their backs.
The Family: A Proclamation to the World
The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
“...we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.
We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society.”
http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,161-1-11-1,00.html
Bingo! I just said to hubby that the judge should have rescued himself.
I should add that this Proclamation was given in 1995, way back when the LDS Church was fighting homosexual legislation in Hawaii.
Sadly, you may be correct.
The Mormons seem to be one of the few religions left not caving to the homosexual militants. Good for them. We need someone to stand up for traditional values.
I think the Judge wanted it to go to SCOTUS too.
I think there are a few good religions out there fighting together, but yes, the numbers are growing smaller.
Bishop Romney not only caved, he invented this
and RomneyCARE and then fled Massachusetts to CA
where his gay marriage now is law of the land.
Note Romney’s use of improper executive authority.
"While former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney claims he did everything possible to throttle homosexual marriage in his state – his campaign now saying he took "every conceivable step within the law to defend traditional marriage" – several constitutional experts say that just isn't so.
"What Romney did [was] he exercised illegal legislative authority," Herb Titus said of the governor's actions after the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court released its opinion in the Goodridge case in 2003. "He was bound by what? There was no order. There wasn't even any order to the Department of Public Health to do anything."
Titus, a Harvard law graduate, was founding dean of Pat Robertson's Regent University Law School. He also worked with former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, ...
Romney's aides have told WND that after four of the seven court members reinterpreted the definition of marriage, he believed he had no choice but to direct clerks and others to change state marriage forms and begin registering same-sex couples.
Some opponents contend that with those actions, Romney did no more or less than create the first homosexual marriages recognized in the nation. And Titus agrees."
"....But the court's decision conflicts with the constitutional philosophy of three co-equal branches of government: executive, legislative and judicial, Titus said. It also violates with the Massachusetts Constitution, which states: "The power of suspending the laws, or (suspending) the execution of the laws, ought never to be exercised but by the legislature..."
And it cannot even be derived from the opinion itself, asserts the pro-family activist group Mass Resistance, which says the decision did four things:
* First, it acknowledged that the current law does not permit same-sex marriage.
"The only reasonable explanation is that the Legislature did not intend that same-sex couples be licensed to marry. We conclude, as did the judge, that G.L. c. 207 may not be construed to permit same-sex couples to marry."
* Second, it said it is NOT striking down the marriage laws (among other things, the Massachusetts Constitution forbids a court to change laws)
"Here, no one argues that striking down the marriage laws is an appropriate form of relief."
* Third, it declared that not allowing same-sex marriages is a violation of the Massachusetts Constitution.
"We declare that barring an individual from the protections, benefits, and obligations of civil marriage solely because that person would marry a person of the same sex violates the Massachusetts Constitution."
* And fourth, given that the court is not changing any laws, the SJC gave the Legislature 180 days to "take such action as it may deem appropriate."
"We vacate the summary judgment for the department. We remand this case to the Superior Court for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion. Entry of judgment shall be stayed for 180 days to permit the Legislature to take such action as it may deem appropriate in light of this opinion."
After the Legislature did nothing during the 180 days, Romney then took action "on his own," the group said.
"Gov. Romney's legal counsel issued a directive to the Justices of the Peace that they must perform same-sex marriages when requested or 'face personal liability' or be fired," the group said."
Thank you to the LDS for working so hard to pass Proposition 8. This gay judge should have recused himself from a case in which he had a clear dog in this hunt.
I think you need a cranial rectum extraction.
Thanks to this judge, there may be a whole lot of that type of activity coming down the pike...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.