I think we are losing perspective here. For me, this is more about judicial activism. They are to interpret laws instituted by the people etc. Whether you believe in gay marriage or not, this judge went against the will of the people and that, to me, is tyranny. It is far worse to me than all of these creative visuals of two guys “doing it” together presented here!
If they can do this on a social issue, what can’t they do?
The Supremes went against the will of a lot of people when they struck down segregation. Was that tyranny? And before you say anything, I am not trying to make any comparisons between race and sexuality.