Where in the Constitution does it mention anything about giving perks to promote, intelligence, education, hard work, physical fitness, or leadership etcetera? The Constitution limits government -it does not define society -DUH...
--paraphrased from a post I made on a similar thread:
The issue regarding marriage is about marriage that is accommodated and granted privilege by society. Society like an economic free market chose to value heterosexual marriage as something that contributes to society. The laws as evidenced in common law determined what exactly was valued. Those that reject this fact and history seem to reject the free market idea of value and suggest there is government mandated value?
Why should those that are predisposed to an unhealthy sexual disorder be granted benefit and privilege -because they get a government certificate that society rejects?
Such marriage innovations are the realm of progressives -those lost in progressive ideas that fly in the face of reality. The "enlightened" viewpoint is severely flawed by the FACTS... If homosexual marriage is so valuable to society THEN where has it been up until now?
Do we discuss the rights of individuals or do we discuss the promotion of a sexual preference here? What about marriage for those that are into sheep?
The liberals have been allowed to define this issue as discrimination against gays. It is not, it is discrimination against an act or series of sexual acts. We discriminate routinely against other activities. Is it discrimination to have laws against drug use, against theft, against ritual murder. Gays do not contribute to society, they do not propagate and provide future generations. They simple practice a sexual act for selfish gratification until they get so old Viagra does not help. If all the gays were put on an island, they would disappear in a generation. Honestly, sharia law is looking better every day. This POS of a judge claims his sexual proclivity played no part in his decision, that is BS. To rule for Prop 8 he would of had to admit HE participates in inappropriate and unprotected activities. Of course his desire for other men’s derriere played a part in his decision.
Yes but you are treating Society and Government as one in the same. You are guilty of the same sin as the leftist you wish to Social Engineer via government goodies. Both you and the leftists are wrong to do so.