Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SOURCE: CA Prop 8 held to be unconstitutional under due process and equal protection.
Drudge Report ^ | 8/04/2010 | Drudge

Posted on 08/04/2010 1:45:48 PM PDT by tsmith130

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-364 last
To: dfwgator

Beastiality will come not under equal protection but under the right to privacy.

Since abortion is under the right to privacy it will be said eventually that what one does in their own homes constiutes that which will then allow anyone to beat their husband/wifes etc etc etc.

The constituion will then allow not the freedom of man from government but for the government to allow whatever depravity it chooses too in order to allow for the contitution of their power.


361 posted on 08/07/2010 8:32:06 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Facinating how our Founders, courts, Congresses, Presidents missed this for well over 200 years, that Gay marriage is a Constitutional right.

Can you blame them? They missed a woman's "right" to an abortion for almost as long.

362 posted on 08/07/2010 10:20:06 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (California Bankruptcy in 4... 3... 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Someone please tell me again why I should take the time to vote? A single judge can overturn the will of the people.

Because when Conservatives quit voting, the socialists and liberals are able to select even more judges. If there was ever a time for all good Conservatives to NOT sit on the sidelines, a time to vote in the elections this November and try to take back the US House and Senate, to remove as many liberal politicians from control of your state as possible, now is the time. This will be a Democrat bloodbath in November. We need help from all Conservatives voting.

363 posted on 08/07/2010 10:27:08 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (California Bankruptcy in 4... 3... 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

How about relatives? If one of them gets their tubes tied, then it is not about inbred offspring. Why can’t a father marry his daughter if they are “in love” and consenting adults. Why can’t a sister marry her brother.

Once you defy the traditional definition of marriage, you allow for anything and everything that does not “hurt” somebody else, such as pedophilia. Other than that, you have to allow for bigamy, polygamy, incest and communal marriages among large groups of people. All legal. All recognized, with benefits.


364 posted on 08/07/2010 10:30:43 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (California Bankruptcy in 4... 3... 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360361-364 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson