To: LS
The methodology of this is lame. You CANNOT simply assume that calories of, say, an apple, are the same as calories from a pear. Foods are not interchangeable. ... But isn't that exactly what the 'calories in must equal calories out' crowd has always claimed: '3,000 calories of butter is the same as 3,000 calories of oatmeal'?
Or do I hear the goalposts screeching ...
9 posted on
08/02/2010 5:00:13 PM PDT by
dread78645
(Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
To: dread78645
In this study, one group (the high-fat group) actually lost weight on “unrestricted calories.”
37 posted on
08/02/2010 7:21:05 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson