You're a liar Rachel. You haven't a clue. You've never used those kinds of devices, you don't know what they can or cannot do with just your finger.
You use vaporous, ever-shifting terms to keep your ignorance hidden, but it doesn't work. Much like your classic "invulnerability" statement about iOS, only to find out that it can be rooted by just visiting a website.
You haven't a clue, and now you're lying (as usual) to cover your errors, rather than actually admitting you were wrong. Hurts your ego too much, I'm sure. That and it damages the Religion of Apple.
No one is bothering to discuss those archaic phones you posted above... because they do not matter made no difference and failed to do what iPhone is doing!
Oh, rational, thinking, logical people are discussing them. Rabid Macolytes are trying to deny they ever existed - or lie about their functionality - because it shows them to be the unquestioning followers of Apple that they are. That they bought the "Apple is the font of all that is Good and Right" story even though it's clearly a lie.
Just like you bought the "invulnerable" line. Like you claimed Apple leads smartphone sales (which it NEVER has). Just like you buy every line that Apple spews forth.
But I still haven't figured out why some random dude who writes sound software drivers cares soooo much to dis on Apple 24x7.
Because I work in the tech industry and make my living designing hardware and software for the consumer electronics giants. I'm not some empty-headed giggle-bucket that has a JD but thinks she's a technological giant when she really knows zilch...
You're a liar Rachel. You haven't a clue. You've never used those kinds of devices, you don't know what they can or cannot do with just your finger.
Pug. You are a PATHETIC LIAR. Not only that, you can't read and don't think anyone else can read.
Actually, I don't believe all that I just posted. I think you can read, do know what you posted and just enjoy making us jump. This is a sick twisted little game for you.
You like to LIE and DISTORT knowing that those who love the truth will jump like little pets to defend truth. That is the sick game you play.
Not only have I owned some of these devices and others like them, I STILL HAVE some of them.
Also, I can read and google tells me about any of them I need to know.
So, your lies and game playing will be exposed AGAIN. Just in case someone new is reading this and doesn't have the time to do the work to see which of us is a sick twisted liar and which of us defends liberty, truth and justice.
Here we go again.
You listed several phones. I will list the proofs one at a time. Take that!
Actually, I know you don't really care, you know I am right, you are just like Chrissy Mathews getting a tingle down your leg watching me do all this work to prove you wrong, when you know you ARE LYING for the sport of it.
HTC TyTN
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_TyTN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB2fsuEMBOY
That is the video where it is compared to the 6700, the phone I had and used for two years before the iPhone came out. I know exactly what it does and doesn't do.
Wiki's last line makes it perfectly clear. AVOID IT! THE SCREEN SUFFERS FROM ALIGNMNET PROBLEMS. So did my 6700 and so did MOST of these STYLUS driven phones with little icons so small a 4 years finger couldn't click them if they could be clicked.
Eten M600
So old and crappy it doesn't even have a wiki page. But here is a video for it. STYLUS and old Palm layout style? Get real. Not even as modern as the 6700 above.
Did you see that little screen keyboard that popped up? TRY typing on THAT with your fingers. LMAO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmNuqd1Ip2g
NEXT !!
QTEK S100, a re-badged HTC Magician Pocket PC Phone.
Same 6700 design. Boring. You LIE AGAIN. Not only have I owned this design type of phone, I am so familiar with it I have friends who could tell the stories of the times I cursed it and they laughed because I spent so much on it!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Magician
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xrulb_mon-ancien-pdaphone-qtek-s100_tech
OK, you lying sob, here is #4!
Samsung i700. Like the M600, it lacks the sliding keyboard and is stylus driven. Very ancient, PDA styled phone. Also the only videos you can find tell you how to replace the screen. According to many forum posts, this thing had horrid screen failure issues. JUNK.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_SPH-i700
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/332571/2155703
Did you even look any of these up? I recall the last time you posted some inane list like this and got me to do all the work, it turned out NONE of your links were accurate at all and some even denied the things you claimed they said.
I guess since you really do not care and just post lies to entertain yourself, it doesn't matter, but I'd think, if it were me, I'd at least TRY and find one or two to be right about... but then I am not SICK, TWISTED and don't get jollies off of making people do stupid people tricks either, so what do I know about how to be an ass clown.
Ready for #5?
Wow... you saved the worst for last? That just is terrible planning.
The A1000 was released in Q4 2004, but was available only on contract through 3 Network, in just a few countries (mostly Australia, Austria, Denmark, Italy, Singapore[SingTel], Sweden and the UK). Although it was presented in two colour schemes, the 3 network offered it only in the dull matte dark-grey / light gray combination. Also, the phone firmware was locked and branded for 3 Network and presented various limitations, like the impossibility of changing internet connectivity accounts.
Anyone get all that?
Only in a few countries? Yeah. Typical Palm look too. I mean, at least the 6700 design TRIED to be useful. These idiots didn't even know there was a box, let alone, how to think outside it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KC7nGuM5v4
So there we have it.
Another fun game with the most incredulous liar and fraud on the internet. All five of PUGs so called Modern Touchscreen Phones are NOTHING OF THE SORT.
His secondary claim that I am an ignorant little girl who never used these types of phones isn't worth laughing at.
So, if you are reading this for the first time, understand, Pug isn't serious. He knows what the iPhone is and does, he just gets his entertainment from LYING and then watching those of us who love the truth jump through all these hoops looking up his archaic posts and refferences to refute him.
He knows he's lying. He knows the things he posts are false. He know we won't let them stand, so he posts them anyway and gets to laugh as we run around all flustered.
It is a very sick game from a very sick mind. But, you, those of you maybe just running across this post and not knowing who is saying what or why, YOU need to know the truth, so that is why many of us play his sick little game.
No price is too high of a price for truth to prevail.