Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ratman83
“The constitution does not define natural born but most take that to mean born in this contry of two parents who are citizens. BO does not meet that definition. SCOTUS should take up the case just to clear up and define this.”

Most do not take that to mean what you say, and the only court case in all this to consider that question in it's opinion came to the answer “born here.” That wasn't what they were asked to determine, but they made their opinion and associated reasoning clear and it has not been successfully challenged.

96 posted on 08/02/2010 2:21:28 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: tired_old_conservative

Where in Wong Kim Ark does it say his US birth to 2 Chinese-citizen parents makes him a “natural born citizen?”


107 posted on 08/02/2010 2:59:44 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson