As I said, pretty thin gruel and none rule on Art II, do they?
And that's why you are so undernourished and wrong as usual. All of the above affirm, confirm, reaffirm and utilize the long-standing definition of natural born citizen as a child born in the country of parents who are its citizens.
You can find no other historical definition.
So I prefer the evidence of the traditional historically documented definition of natural born citizen that we have, to the evidence that you don't have.
Why are you not bothered by the fact that you cannot answer "yes" to the question: Is Barack Obama an Article II natural born citizen???
Bon Appetite --