Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
"Judge land (Hollister v. Obama) is most definitely of sound mind when he editorialized that the issue had been "vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry"

Judges are allowed to editorialize, and often they do. And, judges aren't reversed for what they say in dicta. They're reversed for applying the law incorrectly. Neither Land nor Robinson - or any judge in these eligibility cases - have been reversed, at all.

That is the only relevant criteria for measuring the competency of these judges, or any judge - their rate of reversal.

247 posted on 08/03/2010 2:02:52 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

Indeed ODH. Judge land is a master of the judicially texted, twittered and massaged legal universe. A truly magnificent piece of legal brilliance. In fact, he is far superior to Chief Justice’s Jay and Marshall. It’s no wonder, too, because Jay and Marshall were severely handicapped by not having the ability to rely on the “vigilant citizenry” who had twittered and massaged the serious issues of the day.


255 posted on 08/03/2010 2:36:01 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson