To: LucyT
And let's go one step further with this. It might be one thing to put a forged government document on the internet, but it is a different matter to have it presented to law enforcement authorities or in a court of law.
In this case we have a judge who made a decision to dismiss a case because he saw this "government document" on the internet. It was presented to him as a valid document and it influenced his decision to dismiss.
214 posted on
08/03/2010 12:35:24 PM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Uncle Chip; LucyT
"
And let's go one step further with this. It might be one thing to put a forged government document on the internet, but it is a different matter to have it presented to law enforcement authorities or in a court of law.In this case we have a judge who made a decision to dismiss a case because he saw this "government document" on the internet. It was presented to him as a valid document and it influenced his decision to dismiss."
That's right. That ludicrous decision by that judge was based in part on an image found on the internet. Beyond ridiculous. The faux short form colb has never been entered into the court record with any of these eligibility challenges.
219 posted on
08/03/2010 12:48:13 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson